USPTO serial 98975586
AIKO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEATING, MICHAEL P
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AIKO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Holly Pranger
Holly Pranger PRANGER LAW PC88 GUY PLACE, SUITE 405SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electric coffee grinders; Coffee particle sifting machines; Machines for sorting coffee particles and removing non-conforming materials; Coffee extracting machines for purifying coffee beans; Coffee extracting machines for purifying coffee grinds; Machines for sorting coffee beans and removing non-conforming materials; Machines for sorting coffee grinds and removing non-conforming materials; Machines for sifting coffee grinds | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Electric coffee machines and accessories, namely, electric kettles, hot water heaters, electric coffee pots, coffee roasters; Water purifying machines for the purpose of preparing coffee; Water purifying machines for the purpose of roasting coffee; Empty coffee pods for electric coffee machines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 25, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 25, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 25, 2025 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2025 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2025 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2025 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 20, 2025 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 20, 2025 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 16, 2024 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 16, 2024 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2024 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jun 17, 2024 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |