USPTO serial 98975836
EASYHUB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 774
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RINGLE, JAMES W
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EASYHUB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Wilmington, DE, US
Wilmington, DE, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SERGE YAKUBOV
SERGE YAKUBOV YAKUBOV LAW211 E3RD ST, 2FNEW YORK, NY 10009UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Computer hardware installation and repair, including mobile performance of such services on customer premises; Technical support services, namely, technical advice related to the installation of electric or electronic apparatus, equipment and devices used for automated or partly automated residential security and access control, safety and environmental hazard monitoring, and climate and energy management operations; Technical support services, namely, technical advice related to the repair of electric or electronic apparatus, equipment and devices used for automated or partly automated residential operations | ACTIVE | Jun 28, 2024 |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for smart device management and remote systems management in the field of property management; Providing online non-downloadable computer software platforms for remotely monitoring and controlling, by wired or wireless communication, devices for monitoring and controlling smoke alarms, carbon monoxide alarms, fire alarms, environmental hazard detectors, lighting equipment, security alarms, gas sensors, thermostats, leak detectors, electronic locks, HVAC units, electric doorbells, security and surveillance systems, digital cameras, sirens, key fobs, magnetic strip readers, programmable locking systems, electronic card readers, biometric fingerprint door locks, electrical plugs, sirens, light switches, motion sensors; temperature sensors, gas meters, electric meters, water meters, doorbells, video cameras for monitoring the interior and exterior of homes for security and surveillance; electric meter reading and data analysis | ACTIVE | Jun 21, 2024 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2026 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 7, 2025 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2025 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2025 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 3, 2025 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2025 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 24, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 6, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2025 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 15, 2025 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 19, 2025 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 19, 2025 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2025 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |