USPTO serial 98975871
HOUSE NOTES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 616
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEENAN, CAYLA FAY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOUSE NOTES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Glen Allen, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kristen Duffeler
1 N 5th St Ste 403Richmond, VA 23219United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer application software for mobile phones, namely, software for providing a communication tool for real estate agents, construction contractors and real estate developers to communicate with their respective clients and enabling transmission of photographs and videos | ACTIVE | Jul 2, 2025 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2025 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2025 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 7, 2025 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2025 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 5, 2025 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2025 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 5, 2025 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 16, 2025 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 12, 2025 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 12, 2025 | RGDV | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - REQUEST TO DIVIDE FILED | — |
| May 5, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 5, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 28, 2025 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 13, 2025 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2025 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jan 7, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |