Drawing for GLITCH PRODUCTIONS

USPTO serial 98976110

GLITCH PRODUCTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MILMOE, MAUREEN H
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GLITCH PRODUCTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ANDREW D. SKALE

Andrew D. Skale MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY AND POPEO, P.C3580 CARMEL MOUNTAIN ROADSUITE 300SAN DIEGO, CA 92130

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Key chains; Key holders being key rings; Bracelets; Jewelry chains; Fashion jewelry, namely, bracelets, necklaces, rings, and earrings; Jewelry; Charms for key chains; Charms for key rings; Charms for jewelry; Charms for key rings or key chains coated with precious metals; Key rings comprised of split rings with charms being decorative fobs or trinkets; Decorative ornaments plated with precious metals, namely, jewelry plated with precious metals; Ornaments of precious metal in the nature of jewelry; Ornamental lapel pins; Pins being jewelry; Decorative pins of precious metal being jewelry; Watches; Watch bands; Imitation jewelry; Imitation jewelry ornaments, namely, imitation necklaces and imitation bracelets; Articles of imitation jewelry, namely, imitation necklaces and imitation braceletsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 27, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 18, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 18, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 18, 2026ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 15, 2026ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2026EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 15, 2026JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 15, 2026EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 13, 2026XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Jul 13, 2026XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2026GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 15, 2026GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 15, 2026CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 15, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 24, 2025GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2025GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2025CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 11, 2025DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 11, 2025AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 23, 2024AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 19, 2024DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 19, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 19, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 19, 2024ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2024XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Jun 20, 2024XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 24, 2023TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2023CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 24, 2023COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2023NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 31, 2023NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance