USPTO serial 98977148
YOUR BEST SKIN FROM WITHIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KENEALY, NATALIE LANGFORD
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with YOUR BEST SKIN FROM WITHIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Long Beach, CA, US
Long Beach, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce Margulies
Bruce Margulies Margulies Law PLLC700 Market Street #218Chapel Hill, NC 27516United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Teaching of beauty skills, namely, providing online and in-person educational programs and training for professionals in the esthetic and cosmetology industries in the fields of cosmetic skin procedures and scalp procedures; Educational seminars in the field of beauty therapy; providing online training in the fields of cosmetic skin procedures and scalp procedures; Education services relating to sales training, business management, financial skills and marketing for professionals in the esthetic and cosmetology industries, namely, providing online and in person educational programs and training in the development of esthetic sales skills, business and financial skills, business presentation skills, and patient consultations. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2026 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 19, 2026 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 17, 2026 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 20, 2026 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2026 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 14, 2026 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2025 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 11, 2025 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 11, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 11, 2025 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 23, 2025 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 23, 2025 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |