Drawing for DAYLIGHT

USPTO serial 98977810

DAYLIGHT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMITH, BRIDGETT G
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DAYLIGHT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew J. Allinson

Matthew J. Allinson Transition Point Law, PLLC15617 Evesham PlaceSilver Spring, MD 20905United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039Utility services, namely, electricity power grid load shifting; technical consulting services in the fields of public utilities services related to utilities, power grids and smart grids, smart grid and smart energy devices and appliances, blockchain and non-blockchain networks of smart grid and smart energy devices and appliances connected to power grids, power grid load shifting, power grid resiliency, power generation, power storage, and power distributionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 17, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 19, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 9, 2026DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 9, 2026AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 16, 2026DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 16, 2026ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2026EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Jan 10, 2026TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 10, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2025GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 7, 2025GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 7, 2025CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 25, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 25, 2025CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2025ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2025EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Jul 30, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 3, 2024GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 3, 2024GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 3, 2024CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 22, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 22, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 21, 2024ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 8, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 8, 2024NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Mar 8, 2024NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Mar 8, 2024PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 8, 2024PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2024PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2024MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 6, 2024ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 7, 2023GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2023GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 16, 2023NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2023NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance