USPTO serial 98977821
MULTIVERSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KOPENSKI, CLAUDIA ANN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MULTIVERSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Donostia, Gipuzkoa, ES
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alexander JSW Johnson
Alexander JSW Johnson Fishman Stewart PLLC800 Tower Drive, Suite 610Troy, MI 48098United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable and recorded software for development, maintenance, and operation of large language models, namely, downloadable and recorded artificial intelligence (AI) models, language models, and trained software algorithms for processing data and producing analytical outputs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 9, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 7, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 7, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 11, 2026 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 10, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 12, 2026 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2026 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 22, 2025 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 21, 2025 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 23, 2025 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 23, 2025 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2024 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |