USPTO serial 98979355
CROC FORCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 807Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HURTADO,DIANA V
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 133
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with CROC FORCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Radnor, PA, US
Paulsboro, NJ, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan B. Meyer
Susan B. Meyer Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani LLP101 W. Broadway Road Suite 2000San Diego, CA 92101United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Air powered tools, namely, grinders, polishers, routers, die grinders, circular saws, sanders; Power tools, namely, power-operated handheld grinders, power-operated reciprocating saws, power-operated circular saws, power-operated drywall saws, power-operated routers, power-operated die grinders, power-operated sanders; Power tool accessories, namely, abrasive saw blades for cutting, grinding and polishing concrete, metal, stone, tile, marble, porcelain, quartzite and granite; Metal and diamond power saw blades for power tools for cutting concrete, stone, tile, marble, porcelain, quartzite and granite; Diamond tools, namely diamond core bits, cup wheels specifically adapted for power tools; Diamond tools, namely rail saw blades, bridge saw blades, reciprocating saw blades, all the foregoing specifically adapted for power tools; Buffing pads specifically adapted for power-operated polishers, power-operated floor polishing machines, power-operated handheld grinders; Polishing pads and drums for use with power-operated polishers and power-operated floor polishing machines; Sandpaper polishing pads being sandpaper sheets specially adapted to fit power operated sanders; Back up pads comprised of rubber and aluminum namely, backup pads to adhere to sanding or abrasive pads for use with power-operated random orbital sanders and power-operated handheld grinders, all of the foregoing specially adapted to fit power operated sanders; Router bits and profiling tools for lathing; router bits and profiling tools for use with grinding wheels; Machine parts, namely, polishing discs for power-operated grinders, power-operated routers, and power-operated floor polishing machines; Polishing discs for automated wet-polishing multi-head machines; Polishing system for use in single-head machines comprising grinding and polishing discs for stone profiling and edges; Pads for floor polishing machines; Power-operated staple guns | ACTIVE | Mar 7, 2025 |
| 008 | Hand tools, namely, squares, non-electric standard and ratchet caulk guns, axes, mauls, digging bar, rake, razor blades and cartridges for razor blades made of metal and plastic, utility blades and cartridges for utility blades made of metal and plastic, wrecking bars, putty knives | ACTIVE | Mar 7, 2025 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2026 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2026 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 29, 2026 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 25, 2026 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 7, 2026 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2026 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2026 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2026 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 7, 2025 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 3, 2025 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2025 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 28, 2025 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2025 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 29, 2025 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2025 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2025 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2025 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 24, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 2, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jan 2, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |