USPTO serial 99002543
DB CHORUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JONES, JACQUELYN ANDREA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DB CHORUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montreal (Québec), CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel P. Mullarkey
Daniel P. Mullarkey Polsinelli PCPO BOX 140310Kansas City, MO 64114-0310United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Electronic data collection, data processing, and data analysis, all of the foregoing for business purposes, namely, for use in electric energy allocation management relative to one or more properties; electronic data collection, data processing, and business data analysis, all of the foregoing for business purposes, namely, for use in electric energy device remote diagnostics | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Electronic exchange of data stored in databases accessible via telecommunication networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for electric energy allocation management relative to one or more properties; software development for electric energy allocation management relative to one or more properties; mobile application software development for electric energy allocation management relative to one or more properties; platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms with application program interface (API) software and on-line, non-downloadable software development tools for connecting with organizations for electric energy allocation management relative to one or more properties; software as a service (SaaS) featuring software for electric energy device remote diagnostics; software development for use in electric energy device remote diagnostics; mobile application software development for use in electric energy device remote diagnostics; platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms with application program interface (API) software and on-line, non-downloadable software development tools for use in connecting with organizations for electric energy device remote diagnostics; providing subscription-based temporary use of non-downloadable software for electric energy allocation management relative to one or more properties; providing subscription-based temporary use of non-downloadable software for electric energy device remote diagnostics | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | licensing of software for electric energy allocation management relative to one or more properties; licensing of software for electric energy device remote diagnostics | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 20, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 20, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 5, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 16, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Sep 16, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |