Drawing for MECHA BREAK

USPTO serial 99003704

MECHA BREAK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHMIELARSKI, ANDREW J
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 125

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MECHA BREAK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Yaling Zhou

Yaling Zhou ZYL LAW FIRM LLC101 Nicoll StreetNew Haven, CT 06511United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Arcade video game machines; Balls for sports; Christmas tree ornaments; Electronic action toys; Fishing tackle; Manually-operated exercise equipment; Playing cards; Scale model kits; Scratch cards for playing lottery games; Toy figuresACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 8, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 8, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 8, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 11, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 20, 2025MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance