USPTO serial 99005632
BIOLOFT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OSBORNE, AUDRIANA R
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BIOLOFT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mehmet Polat, Esq.
Mehmet Polat, Esq. Polat Law Firm276 Fifth Avenue Suite 704New York, NY 10001United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Duvets; Throws; Towels; Baby blankets; Bed blankets; Bed covers; Bed sheets; Duvet covers; Sheet sets; Throws designed to also be wrapped around a person; Towel sheet; Towels that may be worn as a dress or similar garment; Towels of textile; Bath towels; Beach towels; Bed throws; Blanket throws; Hooded towels; Terry towels; Turkish towels | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Bathrobes; Slippers; Bath slippers; Beach cover-ups; Disposable slippers | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | Bath mats; Fabric bath mats; Floor coverings, namely, floor runners; Non-slip mats for baths; Textile bath mats | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 20, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 25, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 28, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 26, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 19, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 1, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 31, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 18, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 27, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |