USPTO serial 99008234
TRAILIO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KLEINMAN, CORINNE ANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRAILIO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Asan-si, Chungnam, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maureen E. Kelly
Maureen E. Kelly Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLPP.O. Box 2255IPLaw@VorysColumbus, OH 43216-2255Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Drinking vessels; portable beverage container holders; non-electric cooking pots; tumblers for use as drinking glasses; drinking straws; household containers for foodstuffs; heat-insulated containers for beverages; water bottles sold empty; insulating flasks; collapsible portable beverage container holder | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 8, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 15, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 27, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 4, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 21, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 21, 2025 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2025 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2025 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2025 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 27, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 2025 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |