USPTO serial 99009932
QUALIFY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- XU, ELAINE YILIN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127
What this means
Status 680 means the examining attorney approved your mark for publication in the USPTO Official Gazette. Publication for opposition usually follows within weeks, opening a 30-day window for third parties to oppose. Watch for publication (status 686) and monitor the 30-day opposition window.
Need help with QUALIFY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NEVADA CITY, NV, US
Nevada City, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Heather A. Dunn, Esq.
Heather A. Dunn, Esq. DLA Piper LLP (US)555 Mission Street, Suite 2400San Francisco, CA 94105-2933United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing on-line non-downloadable software for automated analysis and processing of file-based video assets in the broadcast sector; providing on-line non-downloadable software for monitoring of live streaming broadcast content; providing on-line non-downloadable software for video transcoding and text-speech transcriptions; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable computer software applications for management, coordination and tracking of video and audio assets for the media and entertainment industry; Software as a Service (SaaS) services featuring software for automated analysis and processing of file-based video assets in the broadcast sector; Software as a Service (SaaS) services featuring software for video transcoding and text-speech transcriptions; Software as a Service (SaaS) services featuring software applications for management, coordination and tracking of video and audio assets for the media and entertainment industry | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 2021 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 26, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 28, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 6, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 3, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 2, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2025 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 22, 2025 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 18, 2025 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 17, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |