Drawing for COPILOT

USPTO serial 99013796

COPILOT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COGAN, BRITTNEY LORRAINE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COPILOT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Xiaoyun Sun

Xiaoyun Sun Sun IP Law Office, PLLC244 Fifth Avenue, Suite S230New York, NY 10001United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Remotely controlled land vehicle; Driverless cars; Electric vehicles, namely, wheelchairs and scooters; Motorized personal mobility scooters; Mobility scooters; Self-driving cars; Self-balancing electric unicycles; Self-balancing scooters; Vehicles, namely, electronically motorized skateboards; WheelchairsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 21, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 23, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 20, 2025GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 20, 2025GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 20, 2025CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 8, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 8, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 8, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 8, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 2025LOPRLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN—
Jul 6, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 28, 2025LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Jan 24, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 24, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 24, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance