Drawing for KOMODO

USPTO serial 99018380

KOMODO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RIBAUDO, MICHELLE RACHEL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 126

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KOMODO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael Shevlin

9330 Fletcher DrLa Mesa, CA 91941United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Surgical and medical apparatus and instruments for use in spinal surgeryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 16, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 16, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 16, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 31, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 31, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 31, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 31, 2026NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jan 31, 2026PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 31, 2026PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2026MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 28, 2026ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 15, 2025XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Oct 15, 2025XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 15, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 15, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 7, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 28, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 25, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 25, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance