Drawing for EARTHSMART

USPTO serial 99021054

EARTHSMART

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EARTHSMART?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rebecca Liebowitz

Rebecca Liebowitz Venable LLPPO Box 34385Washington, DC 20043-9998United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Meat; Poultry; Chicken; Turkey; Pork; Beef; Processed meat; Processed food products, namely, nuggets and patties consisting of poultry, meat, chicken, or vegetablesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 28, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 30, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 22, 2025GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2025GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2025CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 29, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 29, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 29, 2025ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 21, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 10, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 9, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 30, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 28, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 28, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance