USPTO serial 99021281
AI WORKFORCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 616
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CALLOWAY, CHRISTINA DENISE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AI WORKFORCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mohammad S. Rahman
Mohammad S. Rahman Rahman LLC5850 Waterloo RoadSuite 140Columbia, MD 21045Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable artificial intelligence software for task automation and workflow management; Downloadable artificial intelligence software for use in data analytics; Downloadable computer software platforms for artificial intelligence workflows; Downloadable artificial intelligence software for agent-based control of computer systems | ACTIVE | Jan 29, 2026 |
| 042 | Platform as a service (PaaS) featuring computer software platforms for artificial intelligence-based task automation and workflow management; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for use in managing and automating business processes through artificial intelligence; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for use in managing computer-based information systems with artificial intelligence capabilities; Cloud computing services, namely, cloud computing featuring software for use in developing, configuring, customizing and deploying artificial intelligence applications; Application monitoring and management for others in the nature of a computer monitoring service which tracks artificial intelligence software performance, performs periodic maintenance and provides reports and alerts concerning such performance; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable artificial intelligence software to others for managing, tracking, analyzing, and reporting data across industries including healthcare, finance, and logistics; Consulting services in the fields of artificial intelligence implementation and integration; Providing information in the field of artificial intelligence technology; Computer programming services for others, namely, designing, developing, customizing, testing, implementing and maintaining artificial intelligence software systems for others; Computer programming services for others, namely, designing, developing, customizing, testing, implementing and maintaining agent-based artificial intelligence software systems for others; Information technology consulting services, namely, artificial intelligence integration services for enterprise clients | ACTIVE | Jan 29, 2026 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 1, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 20, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 6, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 4, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2026 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2026 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 10, 2026 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2026 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 28, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 14, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |