USPTO serial 99021619
DEEPSEEK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, KATHLEEN H
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DEEPSEEK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer Van Kirk
Jennifer Van Kirk Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP201 E Washington St. #1200Phoenix, AZ 85004United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer programs for the production of artificial human speech and text; Downloadable computer programs, namely, machine-learning based language and speech processing software; Downloadable speech recognition software; Downloadable computer chatbot software for simulating conversations; Downloadable computer programs for creating and generating text; Downloadable computer programs for natural language processing, generation, understanding and analysis | ACTIVE | Nov 5, 2023 |
| 042 | Providing a website featuring non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence (AI) for the artificial production of human speech and text, natural language processing, generation, understanding and analysis and non-downloadable machine-learning based language and speech processing software; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer chatbot software for simulating conversations; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software and applications for creating and generating text; Research and development in the field of artificial intelligence; Research, development, design and upgrading of computer software | ACTIVE | Jan 15, 2025 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 27, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 6, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 3, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 10, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2025 | LOPR | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jul 9, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2025 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2025 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Feb 12, 2025 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Feb 12, 2025 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |