USPTO serial 99024310
RELAXED LUXURY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CREEF, DAVIS W
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RELAXED LUXURY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeanette E. Sinclare
Jeanette E. Sinclare Sheridan Ross P.C.1560 BroadwaySuite 1200Denver, CO 80202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Arranging cruises on boats and ships; Arranging transport for travelers; Arranging of cruises; Boat cruises; Boat transport; Coordinating travel arrangements for individuals and for groups; Cruise ship services; Escorting of travellers; Organisation of travel; Organization of travel and boat trips; Organization of trips; Organizing transport for travelers; Organizing travel for others; Providing transport for excursions by boat and ship; Providing transport for guided tours; Providing transport for sightseeing tours; Provision of travel information; River transport by boat; River transport by ship; Transport services for sightseeing tours; Transportation of passengers by cruise ship; Travel agency services, namely, making reservations and bookings for cruises; Travel and transport information service; Travel booking agencies; Travel guide services; Travel information services; Travel ticket reservation service | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2026 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2026 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 26, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 14, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 14, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 14, 2025 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2025 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 16, 2025 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2025 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |