USPTO serial 99026915
FACEWRECKERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 748
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REEVES, APRIL ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 124
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FACEWRECKERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sherman Oaks, CA, US
Sherman Oaks, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSH EICHENSTEIN
JOSH EICHENSTEIN EICHENSTEIN LAW FIRM P.C.2029 Century Park Eastste 400Los Angeles, CA 90067Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services in the nature of an esports team, competing in and organizing in-person video game tournaments and competitions; Entertainment in the nature of e-sports competitions featuring live viewing for audiences; Entertainment in the nature of e-sports competitions and tournaments in a league format; Entertainment services for e-sports fans, namely, personal appearances by e-sports players, and providing temporary use of non-downloadable interactive e-sports games in an interactive gameplay experience; Educational services for e-sports fans, namely conducting conferences in the fields of gaming, video games, and esports;Arranging and conducting e-sports events, namely, live multiplayer video game experiences and tournaments; Entertainment in the nature of live performances by video game players representing an e-sports team; entertainment services in the nature of esports exhibitions, contests, and competitive gaming events; organizing video game and esports-related entertainment festivals; all of the foregoing provided under and in connection with the name of an esports team | ACTIVE | Feb 28, 2024 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2026 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 28, 2026 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2026 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 30, 2026 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2026 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2026 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 1, 2026 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 1, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2026 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 1, 2026 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 28, 2026 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2025 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 2, 2025 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2025 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 27, 2025 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2025 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 28, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 22, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |