USPTO serial 99027240
TRANSMIT SECURITY IDENTITY CACHING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELL,JUNA QUEEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 133
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TRANSMIT SECURITY IDENTITY CACHING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Caitlin R. Byczko
Caitlin R. Byczko Barnes & Thornburg LLP11 South Meridian StreetIndianapolis, IN 46204United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | remote online backup of computer data, namely, personal privacy data; electronic data back-up services; computer security services, namely, software for providing seamless authorization and authentication of stored information; computer security services, namely, providing computer security service to verify user or machine identities, user or machine permissions, and for the management of user or machine data, namely, software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for authenticating user identification; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software, namely, management and security software for use by others for ensuring the security of computer networks, databases, computer software, software applications and software development tools; computer security services, namely, providing online non-downloadable computer security software for verifying user and machine information, user and machine permissions, and for the management of user and machine data; computer network verification and authentication services, namely, verification and authentication of digital certificates; computer network identification verification and authentication services, namely, providing online non-downloadable software for verification and authentication of digital tokens, sessions, browser or website cookies and information in the nature of credentials | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 15, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 14, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 14, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |