Drawing for STRATEGY FLOW

USPTO serial 99028504

STRATEGY FLOW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WHELAN, JAIME M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STRATEGY FLOW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

B. Brett Heavner

B. Brett Heavner Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP901 New York Avenue NWWashington, DC 20001United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable mobile application software in the nature of a browser plugin for online analytic processing and for use in combining, reporting and delivering relevant information from various data sources and presenting it in an integrated and simplified form, for project management, for quality management, for customer management, for business planning, for business risk management, for financial risk management, for decision support, and for delivering actionable information and recommended actions directly within a user's workflowACTIVE—
042Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring online analytic processing and for use in combining, reporting and delivering relevant information from various data sources and presenting it in an integrated and simplified form, for project management, for quality management, for customer management, for business planning, for business risk management, for financial risk management, for decision support, and for delivering actionable information and recommended actions directly within a user’s workflowACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2026MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 28, 2026ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 25, 2026ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 24, 2026NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 30, 2025NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 30, 2025PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 24, 2025NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2025CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 27, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 27, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 27, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 16, 2025XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Oct 16, 2025XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 17, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 17, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 9, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 4, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 4, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 4, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance