USPTO serial 99029456
A DIGITAL TWIN FOR YOUR SPEND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUKER, RACHEL EVE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 100
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with A DIGITAL TWIN FOR YOUR SPEND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
H. ARTOUSH OHANIAN
H. ARTOUSH OHANIAN OHANIANIP PLLC604 West 13th StreetSUITE 100Austin, TX 78701Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business management consulting services in the field of namely, account and business auditing for information technology, cyber-security, privacy, technology selection, technology purchasing, technology implementation, and payment systems; auditing services, namely, account and business auditing; tax planning, advice, information and consulting services; forensic accounting services; providing financial information relating to accounts payable, invoice auditing, shipment costs, electronic remittance advice, carrier service price quotations, and payables outsourcing. Litigation support, namely, overseeing litigation and related expenses; preparation of business reports; accounts payable management and payment services, namely, accounts payable debiting services; procurement consulting services, namely, consulting in the field of negotiating and procuring contracts for others for the purchase of goods and services; providing financial benchmarking information and financial metrics information in the field of business expense management; providing information and reports, namely, preparing financial reports for others on accounts payable, invoice auditing, shipment costs, electronic remittance advice, carrier service price quotations, and payables outsourcing; bill payment services; negotiating contracts for others for the maintenance of equipment and facilities; providing business information services relating to payables activities, vendor usage, and product and service supplies. Financial management services; payroll management consulting; legal services, namely, review and preparation of class action claims, and review of recoveries from class action claims to ensure compliance with court orders and judgments; financial reporting advisory services | PARTIALLY PAID | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 30, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 11, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Mar 11, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2025 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2025 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 12, 2025 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 11, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 11, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 11, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 11, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |