USPTO serial 99029543
IDX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 760
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOWARD, PARKER WALDRIP
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IDX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Denver, CO, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN H. CHOI
JOHN H. CHOI JOHN H. CHOI & ASSOCIATES LLC65 CHALLENGER ROADSUITE 100RIDGEFIELD PARK, NJ 07660Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing user identity verification and authentication services, namely, providing user identity management, authentication and verification of personal identification information; Providing electronic verification services using technology for the purposes of authenticating user identity; Software as a service (SAAS) services and identity as a service, namely, hosting software for use by others for performing secure biometric and electronic transactions, namely, software for providing identity management, authentication and verification services; Providing a web hosting platform for use by others for performing secure biometric and electronic transactions, namely, for providing identity management, authentication and verification of personal identification information; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for use by others for performing secure biometric and electronic transactions, namely, for providing identity management, authentication and verification of personal identification information; all of the foregoing services provided to businesses for use by businesses | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 13, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2026 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 13, 2026 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 13, 2026 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 14, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 14, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 17, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 25, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |