USPTO serial 99030010
Serial No. 99030010
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLIFFORD, JOANNE E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 99030010?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Lorain, OH, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roger D. Emerson
Roger D. Emerson EMERSON THOMSON BENNETT, LLC1914 Akron-Peninsula RoadAkron, OH 44313United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Easement specialty equipment, parts and accessories for the utility industry, namely, digger derricks, power-operated, articulating, telescopic insulated lifts for use in landscaping applications, material handling machines in the nature of articulated telescopic booms incorporating removable load carrier jibs used to position loads within difficult to reach areas, and track-driven auxiliary power supply units therefor; Mobile cranes in the nature of digger derricks; proportional hydraulic-controlled machines, namely, truck cranes; All terrain tracked hydraulic drilling rig; Mobile cranes in the nature of digger derrick machines equipped with sensors for controlling, monitoring and switching hydraulic systems; digger derrick-type, truck-mounted drilling rigs; Fixed and mobile cranes in the nature of hinged derrick assemblies comprised of an upper derrick structure, a lower derrick structure, a hinge connecting the upper derrick structure to the lower derrick structure, and at least one hydraulic cylinder allowing the assembly to fold at the hinge. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 18, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 14, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Oct 14, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2025 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |