USPTO serial 99031001
ORKA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RINGLE, JAMES W
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ORKA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Santa Monica, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew J Lattig
Matthew J Lattig CHARTER IP LLCPO BOX 64The Plains, VA 20198United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software for streaming audiovisual and multimedia content via the internet and global communications networks, for streaming audiovisual and multimedia content to mobile digital electronic devices, for searching, organizing, and recommending multimedia content, for creating and providing user access to searchable databases of information and data, and for wireless content delivery; Downloadable computer software, namely, software development tools for the creation of mobile internet applications and client interfaces | ACTIVE | Dec 19, 2021 |
| 035 | Online advertising and marketing services in the field of the programmatic ad marketplace for placing ads on Free Ad Supported Television and Connected TV | ACTIVE | Dec 19, 2021 |
| 038 | Streaming of audiovisual and multimedia content material on the Internet; Video-on-demand transmission services; Transmission and delivery of audiovisual and multimedia content via the internet | ACTIVE | Dec 19, 2021 |
| 041 | Providing a website featuring non-downloadable videos in the field of television shows, movies, sports, and multimedia entertainment content, as well as information, reviews, and recommendations regarding television shows, movies, sports, and multimedia entertainment content; Providing television programs, not downloadable, via video-on-demand transmission services | ACTIVE | Dec 19, 2021 |
| 042 | Hosting of digital content on the Internet | ACTIVE | Dec 19, 2021 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 13, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 23, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |