USPTO serial 99031026
INTELLIGENT PERSONALIZATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 616
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DANG, BAO-NGOC K
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTELLIGENT PERSONALIZATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kristin S. Cornuelle
Kristin S. Cornuelle Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP2050 Main Street, Suite 1100Irvine, CA 92614United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Research and development services in the fields of artificial intelligence and machine learning for healthcare organizations, providers, health plans, employer benefits plans, digital healthcare companies and healthcare consumers; Research, design and development of computer programs and software in the fields of artificial intelligence and machine learning for healthcare organizations, providers, health plans, employer benefits plans, digital healthcare companies and healthcare consumers; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence and machine learning for use in personalizing healthcare experiences, driving adoption and engagement of healthcare and medical products and services, enhancing clinical outcomes and assisting organizations and healthcare professionals in treatment and medical care delivery; Providing online non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence and machine learning for use in personalizing healthcare experiences, driving adoption and engagement of healthcare and medical products and services, enhancing clinical outcomes and assisting organizations and healthcare professionals in treatment and medical care delivery; Scientific research consulting and computer software consulting in the fields of artificial intelligence and machine learning for healthcare organizations, providers, health plans, employer benefits plans, digital healthcare companies and healthcare consumers | ACTIVE | Dec 20, 2023 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2026 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 20, 2026 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2026 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 9, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 9, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 24, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Oct 24, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |