USPTO serial 99035385
SYSDIG SAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WOOD, CAROLINE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SYSDIG SAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA, US
San Francisco, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Holly Pranger
Holly Pranger Pranger Law PC88 Guy Place, Suite 405San Francisco, CA 94105United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software for analyzing, preventing and responding to security threats and attacks to a cloud infrastructure and environment; Downloadable chatbot software for analyzing, preventing and responding to security threats and attacks to a cloud infrastructure and environment; Downloadable software for recommending strategies to prevent security incidents in a cloud infrastructure and environment; Downloadable software for recommending strategies to respond to security incidents in a cloud infrastructure and environment | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for analyzing, preventing and responding to security threats and attacks to a cloud infrastructure and environment; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable chatbot software for analyzing, preventing and responding to security threats and attacks to a cloud infrastructure and environment; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for recommending strategies to prevent security incidents in a cloud infrastructure and environment; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for recommending strategies to respond to security incidents in a cloud infrastructure and environment | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2026 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 27, 2026 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 27, 2026 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 26, 2026 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2025 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2025 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2025 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 27, 2025 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2025 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 28, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 25, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |