USPTO serial 99038562
SNOWFIRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 748
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SANCHEZ RIVERA, MARIA C.
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SNOWFIRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
The Hills, TX, US
The Hills, TX, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PATRICK J. JENNINGS
PATRICK J. JENNINGS PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN, LLP1200 SEVENTEENTH STREET, NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing business decision intelligence services to automate corporate decision-making | ACTIVE | Nov 30, 2022 |
| 042 | Development of customized software for others for use in risk assessment, information security, business analysis, audit and audit planning, and sales management; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for allowing users to automate the making of business decisions | ACTIVE | Nov 30, 2022 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2026 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 2, 2026 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 4, 2026 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2026 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 2, 2026 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 23, 2026 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Apr 23, 2026 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 23, 2026 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 11, 2025 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 11, 2025 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 13, 2025 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2025 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 7, 2025 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2025 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 8, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 7, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |