USPTO serial 99039622
SPARK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNYDER, NELSON B
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPARK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Grand Cayman, KY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elizabeth Baio
Elizabeth Baio Nixon Peabody LLP70 West Madison Street, Suite 5200Chicago, IL 60602United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable and recorded computer software for managing virtual currency transactions; Downloadable computer software for use as a non-custodial cryptocurrency payment wallet for storing, transferring, receiving or providing payment using virtual currency | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Online marketplace services, namely, providing a marketplace for buyers and sellers of digital currency assets | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Providing financial information in the field of virtual currency; Providing financial information in the field of cryptocurrency; Providing information in the field of cryptocurrency exchange price quotations via a data feed; Providing information in the field of cryptocurrency exchange price quotations via a blockchain data feed to smart contracts | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing online non-downloadable computer software for managing virtual currency transactions; Providing on-line non-downloadable computer software platforms for developing, building, and operating distributed applications; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for developing, building, and operating distributed applications; Design, development, and implementation of software for distributed computing platforms; Research and development of computer software; Software development and product development consulting in the field of distributed computing platforms; Providing on-line non-downloadable computer software for use as a non-custodial cryptocurrency wallet for storing, transferring, receiving or providing payment using virtual currency | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 27, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 26, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 9, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 8, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |