USPTO serial 99040403
HACTCAP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 692
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGH, DEEP K
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HACTCAP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
N. ALEXANDER NOLTE
N. ALEXANDER NOLTE NOLTE LACKENBACH SIEGEL111 BROOK STREET, SUITE 101SCARSDALE, NY 10583UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Filters for pharmaceutical manufacturing machines used to remove microorganisms and impurities; Filtering machines for chemical processing; A full line of filters for liquid filtering machines for use in the industries of Electronics and other electronic components; A full line of filters for air filtering machines for use in the industries of Electronics and other electronic components; A full line of filters for liquid filtering machines for use in the industries of Food and Beverages; A full line of filters for air filtering machines for use in the industries of Food and Beverages; A full line of filter cartridges for liquid filtering machines for use in the industries of Electronics and other electronic components; A full line of filter cartridges for air filtering machines for use in the industries of Electronics and other electronic components; A full line of filter cartridges for liquid filtering machines for use in the industries of Food and Beverages; A full line of filter cartridges for air filtering machines for use in the industries of Food and Beverages; Ultrafiltration filters for chemical processing machines used to remove microorganisms and impurities; Filters for chemical processing machines used to remove microorganisms and impurities; Filter cartridges for chemical processing machines and apparatus used to remove microorganisms and impurities | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2026 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jul 28, 2026 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 28, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 22, 2026 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2026 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 22, 2026 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 11, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 26, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 2, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 3, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 24, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |