Drawing for WONDERFUL

USPTO serial 99042534

WONDERFUL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMPSON, HEATHER
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WONDERFUL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bret J. Danow

Bret J. Danow Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP50 Rockefeller PlazaNew York, NY 10020United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Dental polish; Dental varnish for use by dentists; Anti-cavity dental coating preparations containing fluorideACTIVESep 27, 2016
010Dental instruments, namely, prophy angles; Dental instruments, namely, applicator brushes for dispensing and spreading a minute quantity of liquidACTIVESep 25, 2017

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 19, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 21, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 21, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 20, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 20, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 20, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 20, 2025XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Oct 20, 2025XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 22, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 14, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 14, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 14, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance