USPTO serial 99043263
BIONODE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BIONODE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas R. Wolf
Douglas R. Wolf Wolf Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.600 Atlantic AvenueBoston, MA 02210United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | neural networks in the form of recorded or downloadable computer software and hardware used for autonomous artificial intelligence data processing and system processing of data, generation of multi model data sets including language, video, images, sound, physics and any combination of the above, and for adaptive control; neural networks in the form of recorded or downloadable computer software, hardware, and biologics in the nature of biological computing, for autonomous artificial intelligence data processing and system processing of data generation of multi model data sets including language, video, images, sound, physics and any combination of the above, and for adaptive control; neural networks, namely, biological computing; downloadable computer software that uses artificial intelligence and neural networks with biological components for data processing and system processing of data generation of multi model data sets including language, video, images, sound, physics and any combination of the above, and for adaptive control; downloadable biological computing development platform, namely, downloadable computer software platform for biological computing for use in computer vision, language model efficiency, drug discovery and research, bioinformatics, artificial intelligence | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software and software-as-a-service (SaaS) featuring software that uses artificial intelligence and neural networks with biological components for data processing and system processing of data generation of multi model data sets including language, video, images, sound, physics and any combination of the above, and for adaptive control; providing an online non-downloadable biological computing development platform, namely, providing online non-downloadable computer software platform for biological computing for use in computer vision, language model efficiency, drug discovery and research, bioinformatics, artificial intelligence; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software used for autonomous artificial intelligence data processing and system processing of data, generation of multi model data sets including language, video, images, sound, physics and any combination of the above, and for adaptive control | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 18, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 26, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 23, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Oct 23, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |