USPTO serial 99047140
EVERPUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEPHENS, BRIA MICHELLE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EVERPUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Tel Aviv, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lillian Khosravi
Lillian Khosravi Law Office of Lillian Khosravi3275 E. Thousand Oaks Blvd. Suite 211Thousand Oaks, CA 91362United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Pet furniture; Pet furniture in the nature of non-metal portable stairs and ramps for pets; portable pet stairs made of plastic, wood, or composite materials; pet steps for assisting animals in accessing elevated surfaces being non-metal portable pet stairs for assisting animals in accessing elevated surfaces; non-metal portable cushioned and foldable pet stairs; modular pet furniture designed for climbing, stepping, and resting; non-metal ramps for pets; portable pet beds incorporating non-metal step structures | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 2024 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 4, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 4, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 26, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 24, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |