USPTO serial 99048924
ENRICH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GREEN, ASHLEY ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ENRICH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julia Spoor Gard
Julia Spoor Gard Barnes & Thornburg LLP11 South Meridian StreetIndianapolis, IN 46204United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for enabling users to set personal financial goals, to collect, track, manage, and monitor personal financial data and information, and to view data in a customizable interface for purposes of personal financial management; Downloadable computer software using artificial intelligence (AI) for enabling users to set financial goals, to collect, track, manage, and monitor personal financial data and information, and to view data in a customizable interface for purposes of personal financial management | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of a non-downloadable web application for enabling users to set financial goals, to collect, track, manage, and monitor personal financial data and information, and to view data in a customizable interface for purposes of personal financial management; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer chatbot software for simulating conversations; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable chatbot software using artificial intelligence (AI) for answering questions about personal financial goals and investment strategies for purposes of personal financial management | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 28, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 28, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 16, 2026 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 16, 2026 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 17, 2025 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 17, 2025 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |