USPTO serial 99049498
OA ODIN'S ATHLETES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OA ODIN'S ATHLETES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Las Vegas, NV, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin D. Everage
Kevin D. Everage Dickinson Wright PLLC3883 Howard Hughes Pkwy., Suite 800Las Vegas, NV 89169United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable game software for use on motion tracking devices; Motion sensors; High performance computer hardware with specialized features for enhanced game playing ability; Downloadable computer software for tracking information in the field of fitness and athletic training; Downloadable computer software for tracking information in the fields of fitness and athletic training; Electronic communications systems comprised of computer hardware and recorded software for the transmission of data between two points; Computer hardware for measuring force data; Computer hardware for collecting force data; Computer hardware for processing force data; Computer hardware for measuring velocity data; Computer hardware for collecting velocity data; Computer hardware for processing velocity data;; Computer hardware for measuring positioning data; Computer hardware for collecting positioning data; Computer hardware for processing positioning data | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 5, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 22, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 21, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 7, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 2025 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |