USPTO serial 99051879
DRAGONWING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELL, JUSTIN T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DRAGONWING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Diego, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
N. Christopher Norton
N. Christopher Norton ArentFox Schiff LLP1717 K Street, NWWashington, DC 20006-5344United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware, integrated circuits, chipsets, central processing units (CPUs), modems, downloadable and recorded computer software, and downloadable and recorded computer software platforms, all of the foregoing for asset location tracking, intelligent condition monitoring, and managing, operating, securing, and connecting, and deploying artificial intelligence (AI) processing capabilities in internet of things (IoT) enabled devices and connected intelligent edge devices; computer hardware, integrated circuits, chipsets, central processing units (CPUs), modems, downloadable and recorded computer software, and downloadable and recorded computer software platforms, all of the foregoing using artificial intelligence for deploying and running machine learning models in internet of things (IoT) enabled devices; computer hardware, integrated circuits, chipsets, central processing units (CPUs), modems, downloadable and recorded computer software, and downloadable and recorded computer software platforms, all of the foregoing using artificial intelligence for controlling, operating, managing, tracking, and signal processing in networked devices, appliances, vehicles, industrial systems, and utilities in the internet of things (IoT); downloadable and recorded software development kits (SDKs) | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 18, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 17, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Feb 17, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |