USPTO serial 99054769
DINOBLADE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WITKOWSKI, RYAN MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 117
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DINOBLADE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Utsav Mukherjee
Utsav Mukherjee ONE JURIS, PC5233 Fresno AvenueRichmond, CA 94804United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Coffee grinders, other than hand-operated; Kitchen machines, namely, electric standing mixers; Automatic swimming pool cleaners and parts therefor; Swimming pool sweepers; Dust removing installations for cleaning purposes; Snow ploughs; Waste compacting machines; Fertilizer distributing machines, other than hand-operated implements; Agricultural seed planting machine; Electric coffee grinders; Juice extractors, electric; Electric lawn mowers; Seed drills for agricultural machines; Floor scrubbing machines; High pressure washers; Waste disposal units; Coffee extracting machines; Power-operated sprayers for insecticides; Pressure washing machines; Lawnmowers; Blades for electric rotary cutting machines; Autonomous, industrial robots for agriculture use for agricultural irrigation, fertilizer distribution, harvesting, and weeding; electric kitchen machines, namely, high speed blender for food processing; Agricultural implements, other than hand-operated, for automatic weed control and watering, namely, mowers, pumps for use in irrigation systems; Electric machines and apparatus for cleaning rugs, carpets, floors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 18, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 4, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 23, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 21, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 5, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |