Drawing for MADE BETTER

USPTO serial 99057278

MADE BETTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 760
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BICE, DANIEL TRAVIS
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 128

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MADE BETTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MATTHEW D KENDALL

MATTHEW D KENDALL GARDNER LINN BURKHART & ONDERSMA LLP2900 CHARLEVOIX DRIVE SE, SUITE 300GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49546UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031Animal feed for pets; edible delicacies for petsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 19, 2026RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Apr 28, 2026GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 28, 2026GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 28, 2026CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Mar 3, 2026JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 2, 2026EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 2, 2026EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 2, 2025GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 2, 2025GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 2, 2025CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 6, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 6, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 6, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 6, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 6, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 6, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 21, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 26, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 26, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance