Drawing for CUF|SHIELD

USPTO serial 99057935

CUF|SHIELD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 760
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WILSON, MARYNELLE WEST
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CUF|SHIELD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CYNTHIA JOHNSON WALDEN

CYNTHIA JOHNSON WALDEN FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.P.O. BOX 1022MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440-1022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Ceramic modules, namely, ceramic membrane-based microfiltration units for use in water treatment; water filtration equipment, namely, ceramic membranes; filters and modules for microfiltration, ultrafiltration, nanofiltration and distillation of water; racks specifically adapted to hold water filtration equipment in the nature of ceramic filtration units; ceramic filtration apparatus in the nature of filters made of ceramic membranes for water filtration and ceramic filtration systems comprised of ceramic membranes, ceramic modules, and water filtersACTIVE—
037Ceramic membrane filtration plant maintenance; installation of upgrades to polymeric filtration systems; installation of upgrades to ceramic membrane and ceramic filter systems; installation and maintenance of ceramic membrane and ceramic filter systems; installation of ozone systems to ceramic systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 2, 2026GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2026GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2026CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jul 10, 2026EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 10, 2026JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 10, 2026EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 9, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 9, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 9, 2026ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2026XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Mar 27, 2026XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2026GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 9, 2026GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 9, 2026CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 19, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 19, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 19, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 17, 2025APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Sep 10, 2025ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 4, 2025ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 19, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 8, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 8, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 7, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 26, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 26, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance