USPTO serial 99060612
OMI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OMI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA, US
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Wearable computer hardware in the nature of a pendant for recording, transcribing, and summarizing audio conversations; wearable digital electronic devices in the nature of a pendant comprised of software and display screens for recording and transcribing conversations, sending and receiving messages, and providing access to artificial intelligence software applications; wearable computer peripherals in the nature of a pendant for use with smartphones and computers for recording audio, transcribing speech to text, and providing notifications | ACTIVE | May 26, 2024 |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for transcribing, summarizing, and analyzing audio conversations; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence for transcribing speech to text; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for recording, storing, and organizing conversation transcriptions and audio memories; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use with wearable computer hardware devices for conversation transcription and summarization | ACTIVE | May 26, 2024 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 29, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 8, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 8, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 5, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |