USPTO serial 99061445
SUPERCITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DEAN, JULES J.
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUPERCITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Austin, TX, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer Appleman Rackley
Jennifer Appleman Rackley LZ Legal Services, LLC2828 N Central Ave, PMB #1510Phoenix, AZ 85004United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable mobile applications for artificial intelligence (AI) tools to improve communication, connection, and service delivery between local governments and the public, including residents and visitors by providing news feeds, event calendars, and information about community meetings, tools for secure and convenient digital payments for government services, transit fares, licensing fees, fines, utilities, education, commercial transactions, and other payments using mobile wallets, credit or debit cards, ACH, and cash | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Marketing services, namely, promoting or advertising the goods and services of others | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Financial transaction services, namely, providing secure commercial transactions and payment options | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for local governments to manage communications and engagement with the public, including consolidated news aggregation, event promotion, and publication of critical information, administrative services for managing community reports, resident issues, and the enrollment of individuals in government and community programs, including economic support, healthcare, education, workforce development, and small business resources, advertising and promotional services for local businesses, cultural events, and public programs; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for AI-powered tools for local governments to enhance public communications, service delivery, and digital engagement including content management, user administration, secure transaction processing, and data reporting, development and maintenance of technology enabling community issue reporting, program enrollment, and digital identification systems, provision of tools for creating, publishing, and managing content, events, and ticketing for cultural amenities and public resources | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 17, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 15, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 7, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |