Drawing for LAZYBRIDGING

USPTO serial 99065727

LAZYBRIDGING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POLLACK, ALISON FRIEDBERG
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LAZYBRIDGING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kristin S. Cornuelle

Kristin S. Cornuelle Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP2050 Main Street, Suite 1100Irvine, CA 92614United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer software for blockchain technology and blockchain based platforms, namely, downloadable computer software platforms for distributed applications and software using a consensus engine incorporating blockchain technology for securing data with cryptographic information; Downloadable computer application software for blockchain-based platforms, namely, downloadable computer software platforms for distributed applications and software using a consensus engine incorporating blockchain technology for securing data with cryptographic information; Downloadable computer software for managing cryptocurrency transactions using blockchain technology; Distributed blockchain database, namely, downloadable software for managing distributed blockchain databases; Downloadable software to enable asset streaming for the real-time transfer of digital assets or tokens; Blockchain network downloadable computer operating software for distributed applications and software using a consensus engine incorporating blockchain technology for securing data with cryptographic information; Downloadable software for enabling applications to communicate across blockchain ecosystems; Downloadable blockchain software to enable cross-chain interaction; Downloadable software for use in maintaining the security of cross-chain transfers; Downloadable software to enable real-time data streaming across different blockchain networks; Downloadable software for generating cryptographic keys for receiving and spending cryptocurrency; Downloadable software to facilitate the use of a digital currency or digital tokens by members of an online community; Downloadable software for operating and building applications using cryptographic protocols; Downloadable computer software platforms for developing and building distributed software applications and distributed computing platforms; Downloadable computer software platforms for managing blockchainsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 26, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 28, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 24, 2025GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 24, 2025GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 24, 2025CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 24, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 23, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 23, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 6, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 6, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 6, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 6, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 10, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 4, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 4, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance