USPTO serial 99066033
TARAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KENEALY, NATALIE LANGFORD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TARAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Josephine A. Brosas
Josephine A. Brosas Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP633 West Fifth StreetSuite 4000Los Angeles, CA 90071Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Freight logistics management, namely, providing transportation logistics information via computer communication networks; transportation logistics services, namely, providing a software-based platform for monitoring, assigning, and controlling autonomous mobile robots for transportation, delivery and warehouse operations for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing online non-downloadable software for managing and optimizing logistics operations by controlling and monitoring autonomous mobile robots in warehouses, factories, and distribution centers; providing online non-downloadable software for use in communication, namely, for facilitating real-time mobile and web-based communication, monitoring and control of autonomous mobile robots and automated guided vehicles in logistics centers, warehouses and factories providing PaaS (platform as a service) featuring computer software platforms for managing and optimizing logistics operations and supply chain workflows by coordinating, monitoring and controlling autonomous mobile robots and automated guided vehicles in warehouses, factories and distribution centers; providing online non-downloadable computer software for managing, monitoring and optimizing logistics operations by collecting, processing and visualizing data from autonomous mobile robots and automated guided vehicles in warehouses, factories and distribution centers providing online support services for computer program users, namely, providing remote technical assistance, troubleshooting of software and communication problems, and user guidance for operating and managing autonomous mobile robots and automated guided vehicle systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 18, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 11, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 20, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Nov 20, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |