USPTO serial 99069327
+AUTO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TWAY, TATIANA R
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with +AUTO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montclair, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jessica Wan
Jessica Wan Ferguson Case Orr Paterson LLP1050 South Kimball RoadVentura, CA 93004United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | Automotive lubricants, namely, tire lubricant; Automotive binding compositions, namely, rubber vulcanizing cement and tire sealing compounds in the nature of rubber inner liner sealer | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Tire pressure monitoring systems namely electronic tire pressure monitors, automatic indicators of low pressure in tires, tire pressure gauges | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Balancing weights for vehicle wheels; Tire valves for vehicle tires; Valve stems and stem caps for vehicle tires; Tire repair patches; Tire balancing beads being balancing weights for vehicle wheels; Tire inflation tools being pumps for inflating vehicle tires; Balancing weights for vehicles in the nature of adhesive tape wheel weights | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 8, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 9, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 13, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 23, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 1, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jul 1, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |