USPTO serial 99070633
PRESTO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 647Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAHONEY, KATHERINE AILEEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with PRESTO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Wilmington, DE, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRIAN L. BELLES
BRIAN L. BELLES THE BELLES GROUP PC1800 JOHN F. KENNEDY BOULEVARDSUITE 1010PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal ceiling panels; Metal ceiling tiles; Metal building materials, namely, metal ceiling planks, metal grids used to separate and space ceiling tiles and panels, metal clips for ceiling systems, and structural parts therefor; all of the aforementioned goods are building materials used exclusively to form finished non-moveable suspended ceiling systems that are permanently installed and affixed to building structures; Metal building materials, namely, non-moveable, permanently installed suspended ceiling systems comprising panels; all of the aforementioned goods are sold primarily to construction contractors and building materials distributors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2026 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2026 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2026 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2026 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 22, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 18, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2026 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2026 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 18, 2026 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 24, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Mar 24, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 12, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 23, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 11, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |