USPTO serial 99072566
ARENA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WRIGHT, MARCO JABBAR
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARENA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark A. Jansen
Mark A. Jansen Fenwick & West LLP801 California StreetSilicon Valley CenterMountain View, CA 94041-1990Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software for machine learning, deep learning and deep neuronal networks; interactive software based on artificial intelligence, machine learning, deep learning and deep neuronal networks; artificial intelligence software for analysis; machine learning software for analysis; deep learning software for analysis; software for integrating artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning in the field of big data; computer software to automate data warehousing; computer software for creating searchable databases; computer software for application and database integration; none of the foregoing for use in connection with product lifecycle management | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Industrial research and industrial design services; research in the field of artificial intelligence technology; artificial intelligence consultancy; technology consultation in the field of artificial intelligence; software as a service (SaaS) featuring software for machine learning; software as a service (SaaS) featuring software for machine learning, deep learning and deep neuronal networks; providing artificial intelligence computer programs on data networks; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for database management; design and development of databases; development and maintenance of computer database software; installation, maintenance and updating of database software; providing on-line non-downloadable software for use in database management; none of the foregoing for use in connection with product lifecycle management | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 26, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 14, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 18, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 11, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |