Drawing for MULTI ZONE PRO

USPTO serial 99075839

MULTI ZONE PRO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 616
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GARTNER, JOHN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MULTI ZONE PRO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kenneth H. Jack

Kenneth H. Jack Davis & Jack, L.L.C.2121 W. Maple St.Wichita, KS 67213United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Cooking products, namely, baking chamber extensions for conveyor tunnel ovens in the nature of heat capturing extensions for creating separate thermal zones which allow for the cooking of multiple food items in the same oven at the same time.ACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 22, 2026TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION
Jun 22, 2026NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED
Jun 22, 2026PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Jun 22, 2026PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Jun 22, 2026MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 22, 2026ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 18, 2025NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 23, 2025NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Sep 23, 2025PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 17, 2025NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Aug 25, 2025CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 25, 2025XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Aug 25, 2025GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 25, 2025GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 25, 2025CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Aug 24, 2025GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Aug 24, 2025GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 24, 2025CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 15, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 15, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 15, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 12, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 10, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Mar 10, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Mar 10, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance