USPTO serial 99076843
ANACLAIR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHOOR, AMIT KUMAR
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 117
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ANACLAIR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carmine Lippolis
Carmine Lippolis Lippolis Law LLC3477 Misty Valley RdDecatur, GA 30032United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Amulets; Beads for making jewelry; Bracelets; Bracelets made of embroidered textile; Jewelry brooches; Jewelry chains; Cloisonné jewelry; Crucifixes as jewelry; Crucifixes of precious metal, other than jewelry; Earrings; Gold thread jewelry; Hat jewelry; Jewelry; Jewelry boxes; Jewelry charms; Jewelry findings; Jewelry for pets; Jewelry hatpins; Jewelry of yellow amber; Jewelry rolls; Lockets; Medals; Necklaces; Pins being jewelry; Paste jewelry; Pearls; Presentation boxes for jewellery; Presentation boxes for watches; Rings; Rosaries; Sew-on tags of precious metal for clothing; Shoe jewelry; Silver thread jewelry; Stopwatches; Threads of precious metal; Wire of precious metal for jewelry; Tie clips; Tie pins; Watch bands; Watch straps; Watch cases being parts of watches; Watch chains; Watch glasses; Watches; Wrist watches; Pet collar accessories, namely, pendants; Leather jewelry boxes; Body jewelry; Gemstone jewelry; Imitation jewelry; Bronze jewelry; Gold jewelry; Memorial jewelry; Snap jewelry; Marcasite jewelry; Jewelry stickpins; Crystal jewelry; Diamond jewelry; Jewelry making kits; Musical jewelry boxes; Jewelry guard chains; Children's jewelry; Clasps for jewelry; Jewelry, namely, arm cuffs; Jewelry, namely, magnetic necklaces; Jewelry, namely, magnetic pendants; Stainless steel jewelry bracelets; Scarf clips being jewelry; Jewelry for the head; Hair jewelry in the nature of jewelry for use in the hair; Charms for collar jewelry and bracelet; Jewelry in the nature of armbands; Jewelry to be affixed to bikinis; Beard jewelry in the nature of jewelry for use in a beard; Key chains for use as jewelry; Plastic bracelets in the nature of jewelry; Dental jewelry in the nature of tooth gems; Dental jewelry in the nature of tooth charms; Jewelry that fits over the front teeth; Jewelry clips for adapting pierced earrings to clip-on earrings; Jewelry, namely, dog tags for wear by humans for decorative purposes; Jewelry incorporating a computer storage device containing medical information for medical alert purposes; Jewelry in the nature of identification tags for wear by humans for decorative purposes; Jewelry foot chains; Identification bracelets being jewelry; Ear studs; Ear clips; Lapel pins | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 24, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 14, 2025 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 5, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |