USPTO serial 99087480
ELEVATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NEAL, KELLY L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ELEVATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jansen Luke Rigney
Jansen Luke Rigney Eldridge Brooks and Partners12 North Cheyenne Ste# 142Tulsa, OK 74103United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business management consulting services in the field of consumer packaged goods (CPG) brands, food, drugs, and mass merchandise; Business management consulting and advisory services for the consumer packaged goods (CPG) brands, tailored channel strategies, pricing, launch plans, P&L setup, marketing, and organizational structures industry; Business management consulting services in the field of retail edible and inedible goods; Business management consulting and advisory services for the retail edible and inedible goods industry; Consultancy and advisory services in the field of business strategy; Business management consulting with relation to strategy, marketing, sales, operation, product design particularly specializing in the use of analytic and statistic models for the understanding and predicting of consumers, businesses, and market trends and actions | ACTIVE | Mar 16, 2023 |
| 036 | Financial advisory and consultancy services, namely, tailored channel strategies, pricing, launch plans, P&L setup, marketing, and organizational structures; Brokerage in the field of consumer packaged goods (CPG) brands, food, drugs, and mass merchandise; Financial advisory and consultancy services, namely, edible and inedible goods; Business brokerage services and related consulting pertaining to business sales, mergers, acquisitions and business valuations; Business brokerage services and related consulting pertaining to procurement, buying, selling and tendering information and opportunities | ACTIVE | Mar 16, 2023 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 1, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 2, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |